A new assessment of non-assignment through the new anti-transfuguism pact

Abstract

The signing of the new pact against transfugism and two sentences of the Supreme Court once again call into question the figure of non-attachment. The position of the political parties puts the focus of the problem on the alteration of representativeness since the cases of turncoats affect the parties and governability. On the contrary, trasfuguismo is more of a problem that hits local politics and local politics than the parties. This reality has not entered into the debate on non-attachment, nor has the reality of verifying that both those not attached and the defectors do not have the obligation or the opportunity to explain to the rest of the representatives what reasons have weighed on making the decision that turns them into turncoats. Thus, this accountability is only evidenced by exclusion or inclusion in closed and blocked electoral lists, thus distorting inter-electoral responsibility. Thus, the elements that surround the non-ascription are analyzed, such as representativeness, representation, the representative mandate, the municipal groups and the pact itself, all of this in the local government.