The french budgetary reform: “The credibility of quality indicators”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24965/reala.vi315-316.10042Keywords:
Public performance, budgetary reform, efficiency, effectiveness, effectivity, LOLFAbstract
This article aims to shed the light and explain the concept of public performance within the state’s budgetary reform. In addition, it analyzes the concept form of performance and the various models of operations cited in the relevant literature which seem to be largely controversial. The research recognizes that the structural contradictions related to public performance are repeatedly present and largely inherent in the budgetary system itself. This article examines the different forms of public performance operational issues in three countries: the United Kingdom, the United States of America and Canada. This examination is performed in view of the reform of the State’s budget in those countries. The French experience termed “LOLF” is presented and utilized empirically in this research. An examination of the need for the State to focus on these techniques is provided for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness, efficiency and effectivity of LOLF. Also to explore ways to improve the overall performance of the state’s budgetary system.