Brief considerations on the acquisition of works of art in the European regulation of public contracts

Pierpaolo Forte

doi:10.24965/reala.v0i8.10436

Authors

Pierpaolo Forte Università degli studi del Sannio (Italia)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24965/reala.v0i8.10436

Keywords:

Public procurement, acquisitions, art

Abstract

The work, renouncing to a precise definition of art, acknowledges that there are art objects and cultural objects, which, in this way, are relevant also in legal terms, and try to advance some reflections on the relevance of art in relation to the European discipline of public contracts and, in particular, what can be deduced from Directive 2014/24 / EU, which can well be understood as a sort of cultural sign that can provide insights into how art is perceived in Europe, even in political terms, in this historical phase. The paper therefore examines the use of negotiated procedures without prior publication of a contract notice, for the «creation or acquisition of a unique work of art or artistic performance», and to do so faces the problem of the object of the procurement by “contracting authorities” which deals with things or performances (works, supplies or services) relating to artistic products, by examining the needs which a public administration may have in relation to obtaining the availability of a work of art, and the different modes of this type of acquisition. Finally, the study examines the theme of «art exhibitions», trying to prove that they are autonomous objects, which are represented in the European directive under the diction «artistic performance».

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Pierpaolo Forte, Università degli studi del Sannio (Italia)

Pierpaolo Forte (Nápoles, 1965), es Profesor habilitado ordinario de Derecho Administrativo, en posición como profesor asociado en la Università degli studi del Sannio en Benevento (Italia), donde enseña Derecho Administrativo e Instituciones de Derecho Público. Autor de una cincuentena de publicaciones científicas, ha sido, entre otras cosas, asesor legal en el Ministerio de Patrimonio y Cultura italiano, experto en la Presidencia de el Consejo de Ministros italiana, miembro de la Conferencia Regional sobre Contratos y Concesiones en la región de Campania, director científico del Consorcio Interuniversitario ALMALAUREA, miembro de la comisión técnica del Consorcio Interuniversitario CINECA, director de la Fundación Maggio Musicale Fiorentino de Florencia, de la Fundación CIVES, que dirige el Arqueológico Museo virtual (MAV) en Ercolano y de la Fundación Antonio Morra Greco de Nápoles.Actualmente es Presidente de la Fundación Donnaregina de Arte Contemporáneo, que dirige el Museo MADRE de Nápoles, miembro del Consejo de la Superintendencia de Pompeya y miembro del comité directivo de Federculture y de Ravello Lab - conversaciones internacionales.Sus estudios se refieren principalmente a la cultura, los contratos públicos, las formas de gobierno local, las fundaciones públicas, la relación entre la política y la administración pública.

References

BENTLY, L., SHERMAN, B., Intellectual Property Law, Oxford, IV.ª ed., 2014, pág. 340 y ss.

BOYD, W. L., “Museums as Centers of Controversy”, en Journal of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 128, 1999.

BOURDIEU, P., The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature, Columbia University Press, 1993.

BROWN, C. (ed.), Inspiring Action: Museums and Social Change: a Collection of Essays, Museums Etc, Edimburgo, 2009.

CARANTA, R., I contratti pubblici, Giappichelli, Turín, 2012.

CASINI, L. (ed.), La globalizzazione dei beni culturali, Bolonia, Il Mulino, 2010.

CASSESE, S., I beni pubblici. Circolazione e tutela, Milán, Giuffrè, 1969, pág. 261 y s.

CERULI IRELLI, V., Proprietà pubblica e diritti collettivi, Padua, Cedam, 1983.

CLARICH, M., “Considerazioni sui rapporti tra appalti pubblici e concorrenza nel diritto europeo e nazionale”, en Diritto Amministrativo, 2016, pág. 71.

CROCE, B., Breviario di estetica. Quattro lezioni, Laterza, Bari, 1913, pág. 9.

Leonardo DA VINCI, Trattato della Pittura, I Parte, Vicenza, Neri Pozza, 2000.

D’ALBERTI, M., “Interesse pubblico e concorrenza nel codice dei contratti pubblici”, en Dir. Amm., 2008, pág. 297 y ss.

DERIEUX, F. (ed.), Harald Szeeman: Individual Methodology, JRP|Ringier, Zúrich, 2007.

DONATI, A., Law and Art, Diritto civile e arte contemporanea, Giuffré, Milán, 2012.

ECO, U., Opera aperta, Bompiani, Milán, 1976.

FERRARIS, M., Documentalità. Perché è necessario lascar tracce, Roma-Bari, 2009.

FICINO, Marsilio, Teologia platonica, IV, trad. it Bompiani, Milán, 2011.

GIANNINI, M. S., I beni pubblici, Roma, 1963.

GOLDSTEIN, P., “Derivative Rights and Derivative Works in Copyright”, 30 Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA, 1983, pág. 209, 218.

GREENBERG, R., B. W. FERGUSON, S. NAIRNE, Thinking about Exhibitions, Psychology Press, Londres, 1996, pág. 2.

HABERMAS, J., Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit (1962), trad. it. Storia e critica dell’opinione pubblica, Laterza, Bari, 1984.

HEIN, H., The Museum in Transition. A philosophical Perspective, Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington y Londres, 2000.

JAEGER, M., “Il diritto di proprietà quale diritto fondamentale nella giurisprudenza della Corte di Giustizia”, en Eur. dir. priv., 2011, pág. 352 y ss.

JASZI, P., “Is there such a thing as postmodern copyright?”, en 12 Tulane Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Fall, 2009, pág. 105 y ss.

KAPLAN, F. E. S., Museums and the making of «ourselves»: the role of objects in national identity, Leicester University Press, Londres, 1996.

KAPROW, A., “Death in the Museum: Where Art Thou, Sweet Muse?”, en Art Magazine 41, núm. 4, 1967, pág. 40 y s.

KASCHNITZ-WEINBERG, G. V., “Struttura, Ricerca di”, sub voce en Enciclopedia dell’ Arte Antica, Treccani, Roma, 1966.

KEARNS, P., The Legal Concept of Art, Hart Publishing, Oxford, 1998.

LAFARGE, F., “Cultura”, en M. P. CHITI, G. GRECO (eds.), Trattato di diritto amministrativo europeo, II, Giuffré, Milán, 2.ª ed., 2007, pág. 995 y ss.

LANGE, D. D., “Recognizing the Public Domain”, 44 Law and Contemporary Problems, 1981, pág. 171 y ss., http://scholarship.law.duke.edu/faculty_scholarship/824. DOI: doi.org/10.2307/1191227.

LEWITT, S., “Paragraphs on Conceptual Art”, en ALBERRO, A., STIMSON, B. (eds.), Conceptual Art: A Critical Anthology, MIT Press, Boston, 1999.

LITMAN, J., “The Public domain”, 39 Emory L. J. 0, 2.

LONGHI, R., “Proposte per una critica d’arte”, en Paragone, 1, 1950, 1.

LANDES, W. M., POSNER, R. A., «An Economic Analysis of Copyright Law», en Journal of Legal Studies 325, 1989, 332. DOI: doi.org/10.1086/468150.

MCCLEAN, D., SCHUBERT, K. (eds.), Dear Images, Art Copyright and Culture, Ridinghouse, Londres, 2002.

OBRIST, H.-U., A brief history of curating, Zúrich-Dijon, 2008.

PALMA, G., Beni di interesse pubblico e contenuto della proprietà, Jovene, Nápoles, 1971, pág. 358 y ss.

POLICE, A. (eds.), I beni pubblici: tutela, valorizzazione e gestione, Milán, Giuffrè, 2008.

PUGLIATTI, S., Beni e cose in senso giuridico, Giuffré, Milán, 1962, pág. 24 y ss.

REICH, C., “The new property”, en The Yale Law Journal, 1964, vol. 73, núm. 5, pág. 733. DOI: doi.org/10.2307/794645.

SCHWARTZ, H., The Culture of The Copy: Striking, Likenesses, Unreasonable Facsimiles, The MIT Press, Cambridge MA, 2013.

SEN, A., Identità e violenza, Laterza, Roma-Bari.

SMITH, T., Thinking Contemporary Curating, Indipendent Curator International, Nueva York, 2012.

STOKES, S., “Art and copyright: some current issues”, en Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 2006, 1, pág. 272 y ss.

TORCHIA, L., “La nuova Direttiva europea in materia di appalti servizi e forniture nei settori ordinari”, en Dir. Amm., 2015, pág. 291 y ss.

WALRAVENS, N., “La remise en cause des notions traditionnelles”, en L’Art contemporain confronté au droit, L’Art contemporain confronté au droit, atti del Seminario del 8 giugno 2006, Univ. Panthéon-Assas Paris II, pág. 13.