Public opinion in Public Administration theory

Authors

  • Juan Andrés Díaz Guerra Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)
  • Manuel Tamayo Sáez Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (España)
  • Ernesto Carrillo Barroso Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España) http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-659X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.i22.10653

Keywords:

Marketing government, opinion polls, public policy

Abstract

This article reconstructs the normative contributions that some of the main theorists of the Administration have made about public opinion from Wilson to Bozeman. We agree with Lasswell that in a democracy the relationship between public opinion and public policies should be bidirectional. From this perspective, the central questions to be answered would be: what should be the role of public opinion in relation to public administration and policies? And to what extent is it legitimate for public institutions to try to manage public opinion? The answers offered could be grouped into a scale whose first step would circumscribe public opinion to the role of authoritative criticism that would oversee the process of policy formation without interfering in the day-to-day management issues; the second, would be aimed at probing opinion to define strategies and plans that guarantee public support for policies, regulations and services; finally, the citizen, would assume a more relevant and daily role participating directly and even choosing the producers of public services. The management of the opinion with public funds could be considered legitimate and necessary, with the application of opinion research and institutional communication tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Juan Andrés Díaz Guerra, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)

Licenciado en Ciencias Políticas y Sociología por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Gerente de Facultad. Anteriormente profesor de la UCM, URJC y UNED. Opinión pública y política de seguridad.

Manuel Tamayo Sáez, Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (España)

Doctor en Ciencias Políticas por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM). Profesor Contratado Doctor. Opinión pública y políticas públicas. Grupo de Investigación Diseño de Políticas: Transferencia e Innovación Social.

Ernesto Carrillo Barroso, Universidad Complutense de Madrid (España)

Profesor Titular del Departamento de Ciencia Política y de la Administración de la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. 

References

AUCOIN, P. (1990): “Administrative reform in public management: paradigms, principles, paradoxes and pendulums”, en Governance, núm. 3: 115–37.

BERRET, E. J. (1996): “The Role of Public Opinion in Public Administration”, en The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, núm. 537, págs. 150-162.

BOZEMAN, B. (1987): Todas las organizaciones son públicas: tendiendo un puente entre las teorías corporativas privadas y públicas. México, D.F: Fondo de Cultura Económica. Edición en español de 1998.

BOZEMAN, B. (2007): Public Values and Public Interest: Counterbalancing Economic Individualism. Washington. D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

FREDERICKSON, H. G. (1980): New Public Administration. Alabama: The University of Alabama Press.

CROMPTON, J. L. y LAMB, Ch. W. (1986): Marketing Government and Social Services. Nueva York: John Wiley.

GOODNOW, F. J. (1900): Politics and Administration. A Study in Government. Nueva York: Macmillan

HOOD, Ch. (2002): “New Public Management”, en International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Elsevier, págs. 12553-12556.

JONES, M. D., SHANAHAN, E. A. y MCBETH, M. K. (2014): The Science of Stories: Applications of the Narrative Policy Framework. New York: Palgrave

KOTLER, PH. y LEE, N. (2006): Marketing in the Public Sector: A Roadmap for Improved Performance. Upper Saddle River: Wharton School Publishing.

LASSWELL, H. D. (1941): Democracy Through Public Opinion. Menasha: George Banta.

LIPPMAN, W. (1922): Public Opinion. Project Gutenberg EBook. 2014.

MAJONE, G. (1989): Evidence, Argument, and Persuasion in the Policy Process. New Haven: Yale University Press.

MOORE, M. H. (1995): Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

NISKANEN, W. A. (1971): Bureaucracy and representative government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.

OSBORNE, D. y GAEBLER, T. (1992): Reinventing Government: How the Entrepreneurial Spirit is Transforming the Public Sector. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

OSTROM, V. (1971): The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press, 2ª ed.1989.

PARSONS, W. (1995): Public policy: an introduction to the theory and practice of policy analysis. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

PETERS, T. J. y WATERMAN, R. H. (1982): En busca de la excelencia. Lecciones de las empresas mejor gestionadas de Estados Unidos. Barcelona: Ediciones Folio. Edición en español de 1992.

POLLITT, CH. (2003): The Essential Public Manager. Philadelphia: Open University Press.

SCHNEIDER, A. L., INGRAM, H. y DELEON, P. (2014): “Democratic Policy Design: Social Construction of Target Populations”, en SABATIER, P. A. y WEIBLE, CH. M. (eds.): Theory of the Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press, 3ª ed.

SIMON, H. A., SMITHBURG, D. W. y THOMSON, V. A. (1950): Public Administration. Nueva York: Alfred A. Knopf.

WHITE, L. D. (1926): Introduction to the Study of Public Administration. Nueva York: Macmillan, 4ª ed. 1955.

WILSON, W. (1887): “The Study of Administration”, en Political Science Quarterly, vol. 2, núm. 2, págs. 197-222.

Published

01-11-2019

How to Cite

Díaz Guerra, J. A., Sáez, M. T., & Carrillo Barroso, E. (2019). Public opinion in Public Administration theory. Gestión Y Análisis De Políticas Públicas, (22), 6–23. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.i22.10653