The relevance of advocacy coalition framework in contemporary policy analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.vi33-34.389Keywords:
Policy analysis, advocacy coalition framework, ideas, belief system, policy oriented learningAbstract
Policy analysis has improved substancially since the eighties’ decade, because of a new group of studies.
One of the best of them is the advocacy coalition framework. Its methodological rigor and deeply constructed theory allow a wide comprehension of the complexity of policy processes, and make easy its empirical application by a great deal of researchers who have been developing the model. The explicit object of this study is policy change and, even as the framework emphasizes the roll of ideas, it does not ignore any other explicative factor.
Downloads
References
Almond, G. A. y Verba, S. (1963), The Civic Culture. Political Attitudes and Democracy in Five Nations. Princeton: Princeton Unviersity Press.
Baumgartner, F. R. y Jones, B. D. (1993), Agendas and inestability in American politics. Chicago y Londres: The University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, C. J. y Howlett, M. (1992), «The lessons of learning: Reconciling Theories of policy learning and policy change», Policy Sciences 25: 275-294.
Bergeron, H.; Surel, Y. y Valluy, J. (1998), «L’Advocacy Coalition Framework. Une contribution au renouvellement des études de politiques publiques?», Politix 41: 195-223.
Botella, J. (1997), «En torno al concepto de cultura política: dificultades y recursos», en P. del Castillo e I. Crespo, eds., Cultura política. Enfoques teóricos y análisis empírico. Valencia: Tirant lo Blanch.
Braun D. y Busch, A., eds. (1999), Public Policy and Political Ideas. Cheltenham y Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Calvin, C. y Velasco, J. (1997), «Las ideas y el proceso de conformación de las políticas públicas: una revisión de la literatura», Política y Gobierno 4 (1): 169-188.
Cohen, M. March J. G. y Olsen, J. P. (1972), «A Garbage Can Theory of Organizational Choice», Adminstrative Science Quarterly 17: 1-25.
Considine, M. (2005), Making Public Policy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Converse P. E. (1964), «The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics», en D. E. Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent. Nueva York: Free Press.
Evans, P. Ruerchemeyer, D. y Skocpol, Th., comps. (1985), Bringing The State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fischer F. y Forester J., eds., (1993), The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham y Londres: Duke University Press.
Gomà, R. y Subirats, J., coords., (1998), Políticas públicas en España. Contenidos, redes de actores y niveles de gobierno. Barcelona: Ariel.
Haas P. M. (1992), «Introducción: epistemic communities and internactional policy co-ordination», International Organisation 49 (1): 1-35.
Hall, P. A. (1993), «Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State. The case of economic policy making in Britain», Comparative Politics 25: 275-296.
Hall, P. A., ed., (1989), The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism across Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heclo, H. (1974), Modern Social Politics in Britain and Sweden. From Relief to Income Maintenance. New Haven/Londres. Yale University Press.
Heclo, H. (1978), «Issue Networks and the Executive Establishment», en A. King, ed., The new American political system. Washington D.C.: American Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research.
Ibarra, P. Goma, R. González, R. y Martí, S. (2002), «Movimientos sociales, políticas públicas y democracia radical: algunas cuestiones introductorias», en P. Ibarra, S. Martí y R. Gomà, coords., Creadores de democracia radical. Movimientos sociales y redes de políticas públicas. Barcelona: Icaria.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. y Sabatier, P.A. (1993a), «The Dynamics of Policy-Oriented Learning», en P. A. Sabatier y H. C. Jenkins-Smith, eds., Policy Change and Learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Jenkins-Smith, H. C. y Sabatier, P. A. (1993b), «Methodological Appendix: Measuring Longitudinal Change in Elite Belie- fs Using Content Analysis of Public Documents», en P. A. Sabatier y H. C. Jenkins-Smith, eds., Policy Change and Learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press.
John, P. (1998), «The uses and abuses of evolutionary theory in political science: a reply to Allan McConell and Keith Dow- ding», British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (1): 89-94.
Jordan, A. G. (1990b), «Policy Community Realism versus ‘New’ Institutionalism ambiguity», Political Studies 28: 470-484.
Kingdon, J. W. (1984), Agendas, alterantives, and public policies. Nueva York: Longman.
Küebler, D. (2000), Politique de la drogue dans les villes suisses entre ordre e santé. Analyse de conflits de mise en oevre. París y Montreal: L’Harmattan.
Kuhn, T. S. (1962), La estructura de las revoluciones científicas. México, D. F.: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Majone, G. (1989), Evidencia, argumentación y persuasión en la formulación de políticas. México, D. F.: Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública, A. C. y Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Majone, G. (1980), «Policies as theories», Omega 8: 151-162.
Moe, T. (1990), «The politics of structural choice: toward a theory of public bureaucracy», en O. Williamson, ed., Organization Theory: From Chester Barnard to the Present and Beyond. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
Munro, J. F. (1993), «California Water Politics: Explaining Policy Change in a Cognitively Polarized Subsystem», en P. A. Sabatier y H. C. Jenkins-Smith, eds., Policy Change and Learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ostrom, E. (1999), «Institutional Rational Choice. An assessment of the Institutional Analysis and Development Framework», en P. A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Ostrom, E. (1990), Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Insititutions for Collective Action. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
Pressman, J. L. y Wildawsky, A. (1998), Implementación. Cómo grandes expectativas concebidas en Washington se frustran en Oakland. México, D. F.: Colegio Nacional de Ciencias Políticas y Administración Pública, A. C. y Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Reniu Vilamala, J. M. (2002), La formación de gobiernos minoritarios en España, 1977-1996. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas y Siglo XXI.
Sabatier, P. A. (1999a), ed., Theories of Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (1999b), «Fostering the Development of Policy Theory», en P. A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. (1998), «The advocacy coalition framework: revisions and relevance for Europe», Journal of European Public Policy 5, 1: 93-130.
Sabatier, P. A. (1997), «The Status and Development of Policy Theory: A Reply to Hill», en Policy Currents 7: 1-10.
Sabatier, P. A. (1988), «An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning», en Policy Sciences 21: 129-168.
Sabatier, P. A. (1987),«Knowledge,Policy-OrientedLearning,andPolicyChange», en Knowledge: Creation, Difusión, Utilization 8 4): 49-692.
Sabatier, P. A., Hunter, S. y Mclaughlin, S. (1987), «The Devil Shift: Perceptions and Misperceptions of Opponents», Wes- tern Political Quarterly 41: 449-476.
Sabatier, P. A. y Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1999), «The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment», en P. A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Sabatier, P. A. y Jenkins-Smith, H. C. (1993), Policy Change and Learning: An advocacy coalition approach. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schlager, E. (1999), «A Comparison of Frameworks, Theories, and Models of Policy Processes», en P. A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Schlager, E. (1995), «Policy making and collective action: defining coalitions within the advocacy coalition framework», en Policy Sciences 28: 242-270.
Schlager, E. y Blomquist, W. (1996), «A comparison of three emerging theories of the policy process», Political Research Quarterly 49 (3): 651-672.
Sibeon, R. (1999), «Agency, Structure, and Social Change as Cross-Disciplinary Concepts», Politics 19 (3): 139-144.
Simon, H. A. (1985), «Human Nature in Politics: the dialogue of Psychology with Political Science», American Political Science Review 79: 293-304.
Subirats, J. y Gomà, R. (1998), «Políticas públicas: hacia la renovación del instrumental de análisis», en R. Gomà y J. Subi- rats, coords., Políticas públicas en España. Barcelona: Ariel.
Tarrow, S. (1997), El poder en movimiento. Los movimientos sociales, la acción colectiva y la política. Madrid: Alianza.
Zafonte, M. y. Sabatier, P. A (1998), «Shared Beliefs and Functional Interdependence as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping subsystems», Journal of Theoretical Politics 10 (4): 473-505.
Zahariadis, N. (1999), «Ambiguity, Time, and Multiple Streams», en P. A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of Policy Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
