New paradigm, new context: the pharmaceutical policy case

Authors

  • Laura Chaqués Bonafont

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i1.413

Keywords:

Actors networks, pharmaceutical policy, regulatory agencies, interest groups

Abstract

The goal of this article is to give an explanation about how and why the regulation of the pharmaceutical sector changes for the last decade. The underlying assumption is that institutional frameworks are a key variable to explain the dynamics of policy change as anticipated by the policy network literature and the punctuated equilibrium model developed by Baumgartner and Jones. The adoption of a new policy paradigm –the rational use of medicines– cannot only be understood as a direct response to a crisis situation, changes in the political system or/and the consolidation of ideas introduced by active policy entrepreneurs as the policy windows model suggest. The way power relations are institutionalized (or policy networks) is important in order to explain why changes in the pharmaceutical policy are quite smooth and gradual. By the same token, this article argues that a redefinition of the policy image involves a transformation of the policy network. In 2008 the politics of the rational use of medicines are managed by a more open policy network in which policy experts play a more important role than before.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Laura Chaqués Bonafont

Doctora en Ciencias Económicas por la Universidad de Barcelona y Profesora Titular de Ciencia Política y de la Administración de la citada Universidad. Especialista en análisis de políticas públicas, centrándose especialmente en políticas de salud, política del agua y políticas que implican un debate particularmente intenso sobre cuestiones morales. Entre sus publicaciones destacan los libros Estructura y política farmacéutica (Madrid: CIS/Siglo XXI, 2002) y Redes de Políticas Públicas (Madrid: CIS/Siglo XXI, 2005). Actualmente dirige un proyecto de investigación sobre el análisis de la agenda política con apoyo de la European Science Foundation y del Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación.

References

Atkinson, M. y Coleman, W.D. (1989), ‘Strong States and Weak States: sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies’, British Journal of Political Science, 19(1): 47-67.

Baumgartner, F. y Jones, B. (1993), Agenda and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Börzel, T.A. (1998), “Organizing Babylon: On the different conceptions of policy networks”, Public Administration, 76: 253-273.

Chaqués, L. (2002), Estructura y política farmacéutica. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Chaqués, L. (2004), Redes de Políticas públicas. Madrid: Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas.

Chaqués, L. (2009), “Fragmentación, judicialización, e internacionalización de la organización de intereses en el sector farmacéutico”, en X. Seuba, ed., Salud Pública y Patentes Farmacéuticas. Cuestiones de Economía, Política y Derecho, Barcelona: Javier Bosch.

Chaqués, L. y Palau, A. (2007), Agències Reguladores Independents en l’àmbit Social. Anàlisis Comparativa del Sector Farmacèutic i el Sector de Seguretat Alimentària. Escola d’Administració pública de Catalunya.

Chaqués, L. y Palau, A. (2009), “The Dynamics of Policy Change: A Comparative Analysis of the Food Safety and Pharmaceutical Policy in Spain”, Journal of Public Policy, 29 (en prensa).

Coleman, W. D. (1998), “From protected development to market liberalism: paradigm change in agriculture”, Journal of European Public Policy, 5 (4): 632-651.

Hall, P. A. (1993), “Policy Paradigms, Social Learning and the State”, Comparative Politics, 25: 275-96.

Jones, B. y Baumgartner, F. (2005), The Politics of Attention. Chicago: University of Chicago.

Jordana, J. (1995), “El análisis de los policy networks: una nueva perspectiva sobre la relación entre políticas públicas y Estado”, Gestión y Análisis de Políticas Públicas, 3.

Kingdon, J.W. (1995), Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Nueva York: Harper Collins College Publishers.

Krapohl, S. (2004), “Credible Commitment in Non-Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Comparative Analysis of the European Agencies for Pharmaceuticals and Foodstuffs”, European Law Journal, 10(5): 518-538.

Lobo, F. (1992), Medicamentos: Política y Economía. Barcelona: Masson.

Marsh, D. y Smith, M. (2000), “Understanding policy networks: Towards a dialectical approach”, Political Studies 48 (1): 4-21.

Mossialos, E y Oliver, A. (2005), “An Overview of Pharmaceutical Policy in four Countries: France, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdon”, International Journal of Health Planning and Management, 20: 291-306.

Rhodes, R.A.W. (1990), ‘Policy networks. A British perspective’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(3): 1-26.

Richardson, J. y Jordan, A. G. (1979), Governing Under Pressure. Oxford: Martin Robertson.

Rothstein, B. (1996), “Political Institutions: An Overview”, en R. E. Goodin y H. D. Klingemann, eds., A New Handbook of Political Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Seuba X. (ed.) (2009), Salud Pública y Patentes Farmacéuticas. Cuestiones de Economía, Política y Derecho. Barcelona: Javier Bosch.

Skocpol, T. (1985), “Bringing the State Back In: Strategies of Analysis in Current Research”, en P. Evans, D. Rueschemeyer y T. Skocpol, eds., Bringing the Sate Back In. New York: Cambridge University Press.

True, J. L., Jones, B.D. y Baumgartner, F.R. (1999), “Punctuated-equilibrium Theory: Explaining Stability and Change in American Policymaking”, en P.A. Sabatier, ed., Theories of the policy process. Oxford: Westview Press.

Published

01-06-2009

How to Cite

Chaqués Bonafont, L. (2009). New paradigm, new context: the pharmaceutical policy case. Gestión Y Análisis De Políticas Públicas, (1), 65–86. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.v0i1.413