Nudges, consideraciones normativas de sus objetivos y métodos

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.i25.10865

Palabras clave:

nudges, paternalismo libertario, racionalidad, manipulación

Resumen

Júlia de Quintana pursues a PhD on the acceptability of nudges in public policy at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She obtained a bachelor’s degree in Sociology, awarded with the Special Prize by the Academic Affairs Committee (2014) and a master’s degree in Social Policy, Employment and Welfare (2015) from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Her main research interests are behavioural public policy, institutional design and nudges. Her work covers normative an empirical discussion on decision-making and rationality and social policy and explores the potentialities of behavioural insights in areas such as tax compliance and income guarantee schemes.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Júlia De Quintana, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona (España)

Júlia de Quintana pursues a PhD on the acceptability of nudges in public policy at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. She obtained a bachelor’s degree in Sociology, awarded with the Special Prize by the Academic Affairs Committee (2014) and a master’s degree in Social Policy, Employment and Welfare (2015) from the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. Her main research interests are behavioural public policy, institutional design and nudges. Her work covers normative an empirical discussion on decision-making and rationality and social policy and explores the potentialities of behavioural insights in areas such as tax compliance and income guarantee schemes.

Citas

Angner, E., & Loewenstein, G. (2007). Behavioral economics. In U. Mäki (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophy of science: Philosophy of economic, (pp. 641-690). Elsevier.

Baldwin, R. (2014). From Regulation to Behaviour Change: Giving Nudge the Third Degree. Modern Law Review, 77(6), 831-857. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12094

Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press.

Blumenthal-Barby, J. S., & Burroughs, H. (2012). Seeking Better Health Care Outcomes: The Ethics Of Using The «Nudge». The American Journal Of Bioethics, 12(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2011.634481

Bovens, L. (2009). The Ethics of Nudge. In T. Grüne-Yanoff, & S. O. Hansson (Eds.), Preference change. Approaches From Philosophy, Economics And Psychology (pp. 207-219). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2593-7_10

Chetty, R. (2015). Behavioral Economics and Public Policy: A Pragmatic Perspective (NBER Working Paper Series, 20.928). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w20928

Conly, S. (2012). Against Autonomy. Justifying Coercive Paternalism. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139176101

Datta, S., & Mullainathan, S. (2014). Behavioral Design: A New Approach to Development Policy. The Review of Income and Wealth, 60(1), 7-35. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12093

DellaVigna, S. (2009). Psychology And Economics: Evidence From The Field. Journal of Economic literature, 47(2), 315-372. https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.2.315

Dworkin, G. (1988). The Theory And Practice Of Autonomy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625206

Elqayam, S., & Evans, J. S. B. (2011). Subtracting “ought” from “is”: Descriptivism versus normativism in the study of human thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34(5), 233-248. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x1100001x

Elster, J. (2007). Explaining Social Behavior. More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806421

Fischer, M., & Lotz, S. (2014). Is Soft Paternalism Ethically Legitimate?–The Relevance Of Psychological Processes For The Assessment Of Nudge-Based Policies (CGS Working Paper Series, 5-2). Cologne Graduate School in Management, Economics and Social Sciences. https://cgs.uni-koeln.de/fileadmin/wiso_fak/cgs/pdf/working_paper/cgswp_05-02.pdf

Felsen, G., & Reiner, P. B. (2011). How The Neuroscience of Decision Making Informs Our Conception of Autonomy. AJOB Neuroscience, 2(3), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507740.2011.580489

Felsen, G., Castelo, N., & Reiner, P. B. (2013). Decisional enhancement and autonomy: public attitudes towards overt and covert nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(3), 202-213. http://journal.sjdm.org/12/12823/jdm12823.pdf

Felsen, G., & Reiner, P. B. (2015). What can Neuroscience Contribute to the Debate Over Nudging? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 469-479. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0240-9

Gigerenzer, G. (2008). Rationality For Mortals: How People Cope With Uncertainty. Oxford University Press.

Gigerenzer, G. (2015). On the Supposed Evidence for Libertarian Paternalism. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 361-383. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0248-1

Gigerenzer, G. (2018). The Bias Bias In Behavioral Economics. Review of Behavioral Economics, 5(3-4), 303-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/105.00000092

Gneezy, U., Meier, S., & Rey-Biel, P. (2011). When and Why Incentives (Don’t) Work to Modify Behavior. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 25(4), 191-210. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.25.4.191

Grüne-Yanoff, T., & Hertwig, R. (2016). Nudge Versus Boost: How Coherent are Policy and Theory? Minds and Machines, 26(1-2), 149-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-015-9367-9

Guala, F., & Mittone, L. (2015). A Political Justification of Nudging. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 385-395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0241-8

Hagman, W., Andersson, D., Västfjäll, D., & Tinghög, G. (2015). Public Views On Policies Involving Nudges. Review of philosophy and psychology, 6(3), 439-453. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0263-2

Hansen, P. G., & Jespersen, A. M. (2013). Nudge and the Manipulation of Choice. A Framework for the Responsible Use of the Nudge Approach to Behaviour Change in Public Policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), 3-28. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1867299x00002762

Hausman, D. M. (2018). Nudging And Other Ways Of Steering Choices. Intereconomics, 53(1), 17-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10272-018-0713-z

Hausman, D. M., & Welch, B. (2010). Debate: To Nudge or Not to Nudge*. Journal of Political Philosophy, 18(1), 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9760.2009.00351.x

Hedström, P. (2006). Explaining Social Change: An Analytical Approach. Papers. Revista de Sociologia, 80, 73-95. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/papers/v80n0.1770

Hertwig, R., & Ryall, M. D. (2016). Nudge vs. Boost: Agency Dynamics Under ‘Libertarian Paternalism’. Social Science Research Network (SSRN). http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2711166

Hollands, G. J., Shemilt, I., Marteau, T. M., Jebb, S. A., Kelly, M. P., Nakamura, R., Suhrcke, M., & Ogilvie, D. (2013). Altering micro-environments to change population health behaviour: towards an evidence base for choice architecture interventions. BMC Public Health, 13(1), Article 1218. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-13-1218

Infante, G., Lecouteux, G., & Sugden, R. (2016). Preference purification and the inner rational agent: A critique of the conventional wisdom of behavioural welfare economics. Journal of Economic Methodology, 23(1), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350178X.2015.1070527

Jung, J. Y., & Mellers, B. A. (2016). American attitudes toward nudges. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 62-74. http://journal.sjdm.org/15/15824a/jdm15824a.pdf

Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263-291. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185

Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, Fast And Slow. Macmillan.

Kelly, J. (2013). Libertarian paternalism, utilitarism and justice. In C. Coons, & M. Weber (Ed.), Paternalism. Theory and Practice (pp. 216-230). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139179003.012

Laibson, D. (1997). Golden Eggs And Hyperbolic Discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443-478. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355397555253

Loewenstein, G., & Chater, N. (2017). Putting nudges in perspective. Behavioural Public Policy, 1(1), 26-53. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.7

Mills, C. (2013). Why Nudges Matter: A Reply to Goodwin. Politics, 33(1), 28-36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2012.01450.x

Mills, C. (2015). The Heteronomy of Choice Architecture. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 495-509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0242-7

Mitchell, G. (2004). Libertarian Paternalism Is an Oxymoron. Northwestern University Law Review, 99(3,) 1,245-1,276. http://bear.warrington.ufl.edu/brenner/mar3503/articleslinks/libpat-oxy.pdf

Mongin, P., & Cozic, M. (2018). Rethinking nudge: not one but three concepts. Behavioural Public Policy, 2(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2016.16

Nagatsu, M. (2015). Social nudges: their mechanisms and justification. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 481-494. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0245-4

Newell, B. R., & Shanks, D. R. (2014). Unconscious influences on decision making: A critical review. Behavioral And Brain Sciences, 37(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12003214

Pettit, P. (1996). Institutional Design and Rational Choice. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The Theory of Institutional Design (pp. 54-89). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558320.003

Rebonato, R. (2013). A Critical Assessment Of Libertarian Paternalism. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(3), 357-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9265-1

Saghai, Y. (2013). Salvaging the concept of nudge. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39(8), 487-493. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100727

Schmidt, A. T., & Engelen, B. (2020). The ethics of nudging: An overview. Philosophy Compass, 15(4), Article e12658. https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12658

Schubert, C. (12 de octubre de 2015). On the ethics of public nudging: Autonomy and Agency (Working Paper 36). MAGKS Papers on Economics. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2672970

Simon, H. B. (1997). Models Of Bounded Rationality: Empirically Grounded Economic Reason (vol. 3). The MIT Press.

Smith, N. C., Goldstein, D. G., & Johnson, E. J. (2013). Choice without awareness: Ethical and policy implications of defaults. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 32(2), 159-172. https://doi.org/10.1509/jppm.10.114

Sugden, R. (2017). Do people really want to be nudged towards healthy lifestyles? International Review of Economics, 64(2), 113-123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-016-0264-1

Sunstein, C. R. (2015a). Nudges, agency, and abstraction: A reply to critics. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 6(3), 511-529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-015-0266-z

Sunstein, C. R. (2015b). Nudges Do Not Undermine Human Agency. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38(2), 207-210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-015-9289-1

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). People Prefer Educative Nudges (Kind Of). In Human Agency and Behavioral Economics. Nudging Fast and Slow (Palgrave Advances in Behavioral Economics book series. pp. 41-72). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55807-3_3

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2003). Libertarian Paternalism. American Economic Review, 93(2), 175-179. https://doi.org/10.1257/000282803321947001

Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press.

Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics And Biases. Science, 185(4.157), 1.124-1.131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124

Uhlmann, E. L., Pizarro, D. A., & Bloom, P. (2008). Varieties of social cognition. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 38(3), 293-322. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2008.00372.x

White, M. D. (2013). The Manipulation of Choice. Ethics And Libertarian Paternalism. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137313577

Wilkinson, T. M. (2013). Nudging and Manipulation. Political Studies, 61(2), 341-355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00974.x

Publicado

11-03-2021

Cómo citar

De Quintana, J. (2021). Nudges, consideraciones normativas de sus objetivos y métodos. Gestión Y Análisis De Políticas Públicas. Nueva época, (25), 23-37. https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.i25.10865