La evaluación de programas en la Unión Europea

ALDERMAN, N. and WOOD, M. (1989), «Surveys of Regional Innovation? A Feasbility Study for Europe», European Innovation Monitoring System (EIMS), Nº 9. Centre for Urban and Regional Development Studies. University of Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne.

ANTOYANZAS VILLAR, F. (1993), «La evaluación económica en España: el camino re- corrido», Ekonomiaz, nº25, pp 59-69.

ARMADA, M. et al. (1994), Mid-term evaluation of the TELEMAN Programme. Euro- pean Commission Science and Technology Series-IV. Luxembourg.

BALLART, X. (1992), ¿Cómo evaluar programas y servicios públicos? MAP, Colección: Estudios. Madrid.

BOBE, B. and VIALA, H., (1990), Une décennie d’évaluation de la R & D à la Commission des Communautés européennes (1980-90), Communautés Européennes Commission: Politique de la science et de la technologie-XIII. Luxembourg.

BOZZO, U., ELIAS DE FREITAS, J. and HIGGINS, T. (eds.) (1992), Proceedingsof the International Workshop on Science Park Evaluation, Commission of the European Communities: Science and Technology policy series-VIII. Luxembourg.

CAPRON, H. (1993), Economic Quantitative Methods for the Evaluation of the Impact of R &D Programmes- A State-of the-Art, Commission of the European Communities: Science and Technology policy series-XII. Luxembourg.

CAPRON, H. (ed.) (1992), Proceedingsof the Workshop on Quantitative Evaluation of the Impact of R&D Programmes, Commission of the European Communities: Science and Technology policy series-VIII. Luxembourg.

COMISIÓN DE LAS COMUNIDADES EUROPEAS (1992), Evaluación de la Política de la Comunidad Económica Europea en favor de las PYME. Observaciones de la Comisión sobre el informe remitido por la sociedad Deloitte & Touche. Comunicación de la Comisión. Luxembourg.

COMISIÓN EUROPEA (1995), Informe Europeo sobre Indicadores de Ciencia y Tecnología 1994 - Resumen. Luxemburgo.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1989), Evaluation of policy measures for the creation and development of small and medium-sized enterprises - Synthesis report. Luxembourg.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1990), Une décennie d’évaluation de la R et D à la Commission des Communautés Européennes (1980-90). Evaluation de la Recherche. Luxembourg.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1991), Operational guidelines for the ex-post Evaluation of the Actions of the ERDF. Luxembourg.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1992), A guideline for Survey-Techniques in Evaluation of Research. Luxembourg.

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES (1992), Evaluation methodologies for structuralsupport programmes for R&D. Luxembourg.

CUNNINGHAM, P.N., et al. (1994), Analysis of Experience in the use of Veritable Objectives, European Commission. Luxembourg.

DE BANDT, J. (1995), «Research and innovation: Evaluation problems and procedures at different levels», International Journal of Technology Management, vol 10, nº 4- 6, pp 365-377.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE (1993), A Summary Evaluation of the Operational Programme for Industrial Development 1989-1993. Dublin, Ireland.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE (1993), An Evaluation of The Gueltacht Sub-programme. Dublin, Ireland.

DELOITTE & TOUCHE (1993), An Evaluation of The Science & Technology Sub-programme 1989-1993. Dublin, Ireland.

DIXON, G. K. M. (1994), «Evaluating nonprofit programs: Now it’s essential», Non-profit World, vol. 12, nº3, pp. 44-46.

DOBBS, M. F. (1994), «Continuous improvement as continuous implementation: Implementing TQM in the city of Santa Ana.» Public Productivity & Management Review, vol 18, nº1, pp. 89-100.

DREWETT, A. (1997): Evaluation and consultation. Learning the lessons of user involvement». Evaluation, Vol. 3, nº 2, pp. 189-204.

ERNST & YOUNG (1993), An Evaluation of the utilisation of the Community’s Structural Funds by SMEs. Final Report, Commission of the European Communities. Luxembourg.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1991), Guidelines for ex post evaluation of structural support programmes for research and technology development (RTD). Draft working paper. CEC-DGXII Monitor/SPEAR RTD Network on Methodologies for Evaluation of Structural Support Programmes for RTD. Luxembourg.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1994), The European Report on Science and Technology Indicators 1994. Luxembourg.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1995), Targeted Socio-Economic Research (1994-98): work-programme, EC-Science Research Development. Luxembourg.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1995), Targeted Socio-Economic Research (TSER): information package, EC- Science Research Development. Luxembourg.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION (1995), Common Guide for Monitoring and Interim Evaluation. Luxembourg.

GRÜNEWALD, W. and SMITH, K. (1994), The Community Innovation Survey - Status and Perspectives, EC Innovation series. Luxembourg.

HORNSCHILD, H. and MEYER-KRAHMER, F. (1992), Evaluation of Economic Effects: Relevance and Impacts of EC-Programmes promoting Industrial R&D with special emphasis on Small and Medium sized Enterprises, Commission of the European Communities: Science and Technology policy series-IV. Luxembourg.

JOERGENSEN, L.B. et al. (1994), Evaluation of the MONITORProgramme (1989-1993), European Commission Science and Technology policy series-XL. Luxembourg.

LAHLOU, S. et al. (1992), A Guideline for Survey-Techniques in Evaluation of Research, Commission of the European Communities. Luxembourg.

MEANS (1993) Comment évaluer les effets structurants? État des débats. Bruxelles.

MEANS (1993) Comment maîtriser la technicité d’une évaluation. Synthèse de cins étu- des de cas 1993. Bruxelles.

MEANS (1993) L´evaluation des politiques structurelles. Enquête duprés de 220 experts européens. Bruxelles.

MEANS (1993) L´evaluation des politiques structurelles. Glossaire en Cinq langues. Bruxelles.

MEANS (1993), Méthodes d’Evaluation des Actions de Nature Structurelle: Synthèse et recommandations du Programme MEANS. Bruxelles.

MEANS (1995), For improved evaluations of community programmes – Results of the 1995 MEANS programme, European Commission. Brussels.

MEANS (1999), «For improved evaluations of community programmes – Results of the 1999 MEANS programme», European Commission. Brussels.

MICES, M.B. and HOBERMAN, A.M. (1994), Qualitative Data Analysis. Sage Publications. London.

MONNIER, E. (1995), Evaluación de la acción de los poderes públicos. Ed. Instituto de Estudios Fiscales, Colección: Estudios de Hacienda Pública, 2. Ministerio de Economía y Hacienda, Madrid.

MORRISEY, O. (1995), «Shiting Paradigms. Discourse analysis as an evaluation approach for technology asseement». Evaluation, Vol. 1, nº 2, pp. 217-235.

MURPHY, B. (1996), A presentation on Regional Innovation Strategies and Technology Transfer. WMEB. Birmingham. England.

NELSON, G.S. et al. (1993), Evaluation of the STD II Programme (1987-91), Commission of the European Communities: Science and Technology policy series- LXXXV. Luxembourg.

O’DONNELLAN, N. (1996), Marketing Sub Programme: final evaluation report. Industrial Evaluation Unit. Dublin, Ireland.

PATTON, M.Q. (1997): Utilization-Focused Evaluation. SAGE Publications.

PEREIRA L.C., HIGGINS, T. and ELIAS DE FREITAS, J. (1992), Proceedingsof the International Workshop on Evaluation Methodologies for Structural Support Programmes for R&D, Universidad de Minho. Braga, Portugal.

PREST UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER (1990), The Impact and Utility of European Commission Research Programme Evaluation Reports. Commission of the European Communities: Science and Technology policy series-III. Luxembourg.

RESTRERO RAMÍREZ, P. (1993), «Los sistemas de información básicos para la evaluación de programas.» Revista de Servicios Sociales y Política Social, nº 30, pp. 101-122.

RUMILLAT, C. and TOULEMONDE, J. (1993), Comment évaluer les effets de synergie? État des débats méthodologiques (II). MEANS, Commission des Communautés Européennes. Bruxelles.

SÁNCHEZ, M.P. (1992), «Política Científica y Tecnológica en España. La evaluación», Economistas, nº 55, pp. 334-337.

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT OFFICE (1989), R & D Assessment - A Guide for Customers and Managers of Research and Development, Cabinet Office. HMSO. London, England.

SPENLEHAUER, V. and TOULEMONDE, J. (1993), Comment maîtriser la technicité d`une évaluation ? Synthèse de cinq études de cas, Programa MEANS. Bruxelles.

THE CIRCA GROUP (1993), Review of Techstart and Technology Management Program- mes 1989 to 1991/2. Dublin, Ireland.

VANDERPLAAT, M. (1995): «Beyond technique. Issues en evaluating for empowerment». Evaluation, Vol. 1, nº 1, pp. 81-96.

VEDUNG, E. (1997): Evaluación de políticas públicas y programas. Ed. Instituto Nacional de Servicios Sociales, Colección: Servicios Sociales. Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, Madrid.

WILLIAMS, F. P. et al. (1994), «Barriers effective performance review: The seduction of raw data», Public Administration Review, Vol. 54, nº 6, pp. 537-542.