Effects of multilevel governance on the design and implementation of sustainable mobility plans

Gülfem Cevheribucak

doi:10.24965/gapp.11264

Authors

Gülfem Cevheribucak University of Limerick. Departamento de Política y Administración Pública (Irlanda – Ireland) https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9880-0628

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.11264

Keywords:

multilevel governance, sustainability transitions, sustainable urban mobility, subnational government

Abstract

Objectives: The polycentric nature of multilevel governance structures with multiple actors interacting at different levels can facilitate sustainability transitions. This study aims to explore the impact of multilevel governance on the design and implementation of sustainable urban mobility plans within the two-tiered government structure of Sweden. Methodology: The study is based on qualitative review of the academic literature, secondary sources including review of national policy documents and empirical insights drawn from the case study of Umeå, a medium-sized Swedish city which takes part in several national, local, and transnational initiatives to accelerate sustainability transitions. The empirical data is collected through semi-structured interviews with policy experts, policymakers, transport, and urban planners who are responsible for formulation and implementation of transport policies within national and local institutions. Results: The multilevel governance of transport and sustainable urban mobility policies in Sweden produces several positive effects for design and implementation of policies. These include clear division of responsibilities among public authorities at national, regional, and local government level which helps to overcome the problems such as lack of accountability and responsibility. Conclusions: Multilevel governance of sustainable urban mobility policies in Sweden enables local authorities to have access additional resources and knowledge exchange through networks consisting of various public and private actors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Gülfem Cevheribucak, University of Limerick. Departamento de Política y Administración Pública (Irlanda – Ireland)

Doctorando en el Departamento de Política y Administración Pública de la Universidad de Limerick. Sus intereses de investigación incluyen políticas públicas comparadas, gobernanza del clima y transiciones sostenibles. Actualmente trabaja en el proyecto "Gobierno local y movilidad urbana sostenible", que se centra en la relación entre la autonomía local y las transiciones de movilidad urbana sostenible a través de estudios de casos transnacionales en Europa.

References

Åkerman, J. and Höjer, M. (2006). How much transport can the climate stand? - Sweden is on a sustainable path in 2050. Energy Policy, 34(14), 1944-1957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2005.02.009

Antonson, H., Isaksson, K., Storbjörk, S. and Hjerpe, M. (2016). Negotiating climate change responses: Regional and local perspectives on transport and coastal zone planning in South Sweden. Land Use Policy, (52), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.12.033

Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M. and Marsden, G. (2015). Blame Games and Climate Change: Accountability, Multi-Level Governance and Carbon Management. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 64-88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856x.12040

Baldersheim, H. and Ståhlberg, K. (2002). From Guided Democracy to Multi-Level Governance: Trends in Central-Local Relations in the Nordic Countries. Local Government Studies, 28(3), 74-90. https://doi.org/10.1080/714004149

Benz, A. (2021). Policy Change and Innovation in Multilevel Governance. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Brůhová Foltýnová, H., Vejchodská, E., Rybová, K. and Květoň, V. (2020). Sustainable urban mobility: One definition, different stakeholders’ opinions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, (87), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102465

Bulkeley, H. (2010). Cities and the Governing of Climate Change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 35(1), 229-253. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-072809-101747

De Mello, L. and Jalles, J. T. (2022). Decentralisation and the environment: Survey-based and cross-country evidence [REM Working Paper 0215-2022]. ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa. https://rem.rc.iseg.ulisboa.pt/wps/pdf/REM_WP_0215_2022.pdf

Ebinger, F. and Richter, P. (2016). Decentralizing for performance? A quantitative assessment of functional reforms in the German Länder. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 82(2), 291-314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315586916

Elander, I. and Montin, S. (1990). Decentralisation and control: central-local government relations in Sweden. Policy and Politics, 18(3), 165-180.

European Commission, Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy Ladner, A., Keuffer, N. and Baldersheim, H. (2016). Self-rule index for local authorities (release 1.0): final report. Publications Office of the European Union. https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2776/432291

Feltenius, D. (2015). Multi-Level governance as ‘Post-Constitutional’ politics: subnational actors and the Swedish Constitution. Local Government Studies, 41(2), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2014.919267

Fenton, P. (2017). National infrastructure, small towns, and sustainable mobility – experiences from policy and strategy in two Swedish municipalities. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(9), 1660–1682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1246998

Fenton, P. and Gustafsson, S. (2015). Contesting sustainability in urban transport - perspectives from a Swedish town. Natural Resources Forum, 39(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12061

Fuhr, H., Hickmann, T. and Kern, K. (2018). The role of cities in multi-level climate governance: local climate policies and the 1.5 °C target. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, (30), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.10.006

Hooghe, L. (1995). Subnational mobilisation in the European union. West European Politics, 18(3), 175-198. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402389508425097

Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009). Does Efficiency Shape the Territorial Structure of Government? Annual Review of Political Science, 12(1), 225-241. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.041107.102315

Hudson, C. (1993). Against all odds: local economic development policies and local government autonomy in Sweden and Britain [PhD dissertation]. Umeå universitet. https://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:umu:diva-66109

Hysing, E., Frändberg, L. and Vilhelmson, B. (2014). Compromising sustainable mobility? The case of the Gothenburg congestion tax. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(6), 1058-1075. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.912615

Johansson, F., Tornberg, P. and Fernström, A. (2018). A function-oriented approach to transport planning in Sweden: Limits and possibilities from a policy perspective. Transport Policy, (63), 30-38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.11.006

Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Schoenefeld, J., Van Asselt, H. and Forster, J. (2018). Governing Climate Change Polycentrically: Setting the Scene. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. Van Asselt and J. Forster (eds.), Governing Climate Change: Polycentricity in Action? (pp. 3-26). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.002

Joss, S. (2015). Sustainability and the City? In Sustainable Cities: Governing for Urban Innovation (2.ª ed., pp. 1-43). Palgrave Macmillan.

Kern, K. (2019). Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 125-145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1521979

Köhler, J., Whitmarsh, L., Nykvist, B., Schilperoord, M., Bergman, N. and Haxeltine, A. (2009). A transitions model for sustainable mobility. Ecological Economics, 68(12), 2985-2995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.06.027

Kristianssen, A. C. and Granberg, M. (2021). Transforming Local Climate Adaptation Organization: Barriers and Progress in 13 Swedish Municipalities. Climate, 9(4), article 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9040052

Kyriakopoulou, E., Lu, T. and Hart, R. (2021). Towards zero emissions from Swedish urban transport [Report 7004 from the project ‘To buy or not to buy’]. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/publikationer/7000/towards-zero-emissions-from-swedish-urban-transport/

Litman, T. (2023). Well measured: Developing Indicators for Sustainable and Livable Transport Planning. Victoria Transport Policy Institute. https://www.vtpi.org/wellmeas.pdf

Loo, B. P. and Chow, S. Y. (2006). Sustainable Urban Transportation: Concepts, Policies, and Methodologies. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 132(2), 76-79. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)0733-9488(2006)132:2(76)

McGinnis, M. D. and Ostrom, E. (2012). Reflection on Vincent Ostrom, Public Administration and Polycentricity. Public Administration Review, 72(1), 15-25.

Mukhtar-Landgren, D. (2021). Local Autonomy in Temporary Organizations: The Case of Smart City Pilots. Administration and Society, 53(10), 1485-1511. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953997211009884

Mukhtar-Landgren, D., Kronsell, A., Voytenko Palgan, Y. and von Wirth, T. (2019). Municipalities as enablers in urban experimentation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 21(6), 718-733. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1672525

Nykvist, B. and Whitmarsh, L. (2008). A multi-level analysis of sustainable mobility transitions: Niche development in the UK and Sweden. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 75(9), 1373-1387. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2008.05.006

Ostrom, E. (2010a). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550-557. https://commonsblog.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/elinor-ostrom-polycentric-system-for-coping-with-climate-change.pdf

Ostrom, E. (2010b). Nested externalities and polycentric institutions: must we wait for global solutions to climate change before taking actions at other scales? Economic Theory, 49(2), 353-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00199-010-0558-6

Robertson, K. (2015). Comparison of the EU’s Sustainable urban mobility plan (SUMP) and the Swedish planning support Transport for an attractive city (TRAST). Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute – VTI. https://vti.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:856558/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M., Schulze, K. and Sorvali, J. (2023). What motivates and hinders municipal adaptation policy? Exploring vertical and horizontal diffusion in Hessen and Finland. Regional Environmental Change, (23), article 53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-023-02048-9

Stigler, G. J. (1957). The Tenable Range of Functions of Local Government. In Federal Expenditure Policy for Economic Growth and Stability: Papers Submitted by Panelists Appearing Before the Subcommittee on Fiscal Policy (pp. 213-219). Government Printing Office EE. UU. Disponible en: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/1151/item/1605?start_page=7

Westerink, J., Haase, D., Bauer, A., Ravetz, J., Jarrige, F. and Aalbers, C. B. E. M. (2013). Dealing with Sustainability Trade-Offs of the Compact City in Peri-Urban Planning Across European City Regions. European Planning Studies, 21(4), 473-497. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722927