Revisiting Public Administration education in Central and Eastern Europe: From stablishing the discipline to facing marginalization

Katarina Staronová; György Gajduschek

doi:10.24965/gapp.11634

Authors

Katarina Staronová Comenius University Bratislava (Eslovaquia – Slovakia) https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4581-4791
György Gajduschek Institute of Social and Political Sciences. Corvinus University of Budapest (Hungría – Hungary)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.24965/gapp.11634

Keywords:

Central and Eastern Europe, public administration education, post-communist countries, education, public administration, comparative

Abstract

Objectives: This article revisits the development of public administration (PA) education in the post-communist countries of Central and Eastern Europe (CEE), tracing its evolution from disciplinary establishment after 1989 to its current challenges of marginalization and declining attractiveness. Methodology: Drawing on a historical institutionalist perspective, the study examines how pre-communist administrative traditions, communist legacies, and post-communist reforms have jointly shaped the content, institutional positioning, and identity of PA education. The analysis covers PA programs in eleven Central European post-communist countries that became members of the European Union (EU) in three waves, notably the historic 2004 enlargement when 8 CEE countries join (Czechia, Estonia, Hungary, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Slovakia, Slovenia), followed by Bulgaria and Romania in 2007, and Croatia in 2013. The paper combines desk research, curriculum analyses from existing comparative datasets, and an original overview of programs accredited by the European Association for Public Administration Accreditation (EAPAA). Results: The findings demonstrate persistent diversity and fragmentation in PA education, with strong legalistic orientations remaining dominant despite gradual moves toward managerial and governance-based approaches. The paper further highlights growing tensions between internationalization and local relevance, as well as between academic incentives and practical administrative needs. Conclusions: The article concludes that no unified PA identity has emerged in the region; instead, PA education in CEE reflects multiple, path-dependent trajectories shaped by historical legacies, external pressures, and contemporary political developments. Moreover, in recent years demographic decline, reduced prestige of the civil service, and democratic backsliding have exacerbated declining student demand that all together threaten PA programs sustainability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Katarina Staronová, Comenius University Bratislava (Eslovaquia – Slovakia)

Katarina Staronová is an associate professor at the Institute of Public Policy, Faculty of Social and Economic Sciences, Comenius University Bratislava, Slovakia. Her research focuses on executive relations, politicization and patronage of civil service and looks into both formal and informal ways of doing so.

György Gajduschek, Institute of Social and Political Sciences. Corvinus University of Budapest (Hungría – Hungary)

György Gajduschek is a professor in public law and public policy at the Institute of Social and Political Sciences, Corvinus University of Budapest. His main research interest is civil service and politicization of the civil service system, as well as formal (i.e., legal) and informal methods to mitigate political pressure on civil service.

References

Babbie, E. R. (2020). The practice of social research. Cengage Learning.

Bauer, M. W. (2025). Authoritarian drift, variegated paths: mapping administrative transformation strategies under illiberal rule. Public Administration Review, 85(6), 1598-1610. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70028

Brans, M. & Coenen, L. (2016). The Europeanization of public administration teaching. Policy and Society, 35(4), 333-349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.11.005

Connaughton, B. & Verheijen, T. (2000). Developing public administration education in Central and Eastern Europe: The significance of the European dimension in academic programmes. In T. Verheijen & J. Nemec (eds.), Building Higher Education Programs in Public Administration in CEE Countries (pp. 328-345). NISPAcee Press.

Ekiert, G. (2012). The illiberal challenge in post-communist Europe. Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 8(2), 63-77. https://www.ce.uw.edu.pl/files/users/mikolaj-rakusa-suszczewski/files/paper-2-eckiert-illiberal-chalenge.pdf

Gajduschek, G. (2007). Socialist and Post-Socialist Civil Service in Hungary. In A. Jakab, P. Takács & A. F. Tatham (eds.), The transformation of the Hungarian legal order 1985-2005 (pp. 123-126). Kluwer Law International.

Gajduschek, G. & Hajnal, G. (2003). Civil service training assistance projects in the former communist countries: An assessment. LGI Studies.

Gajduschek, G. & Hajnal, G. (2022). Public administration education in Central and Eastern Europe. In K. A. Bottom, J. Diamond, P. T. Dunning & I. C. Elliott (eds.), Handbook of Teaching Public Administration (pp. 45-56). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Gellén, M. (2014). Public administration education in a continental European legalistic setting: the Hungarian case. Teaching Public Administration, 32(2), 111-126. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739413502217

Hajnal, G. (2003). Diversity and convergence: A quantitative analysis of European public administration education programs. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 9(4), 245-258. https://www.jstor.org/stable/40215622

Hajnal, G. (2014). Public administration education in Europe: Continuity or reorientation? Teaching Public Administration, 33(2), 95-114. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739414538043

Hajnal, G. (2016). Illiberal or simply unorthodox? Public Administration education in Hungary: a comparative perspective. Teaching Public Administration, 34(2), 205-224. https://doi.org/10.1177/0144739415621784

Hintea, C., Ringsmuth, D. & Mora, C. (2006). The reform of the higher education public administration programs in the context of public administration reform in Romania. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 2(16), 40-46. https://rtsa.ro/tras/index.php/tras/article/view/227

Jahoda, R., Maly, I., Nemec, J. & Spacek, D. (2022). The low demand for public administration programs in the Czech Republic and Slovakia: What may be behind it? Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 18(SI), 99-117. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/tras.SI2022.7

Jenei, G. & Mike, K. (2008). Public Administration and Public Policy Degree Programmes in Europe: The Road from Bologna. NISPAcee Press. https://www.nispa.org/press/publication.php?id=127

Kickert, W. J. (2008). The study of public management in Europe and the United States: a comparative analysis of national distinctiveness. dms–der moderne staat–Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 1(1), 221-234. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v1i1.11

Knox, C. & Orazgaliyev, S. (2025). Public Administration Country Study: Kazakhstan—Post- Soviet Legacy, Modernisation, and Hybridity. Public Administration Review, 85(6), 1888-1900. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70030

Kopric, I. (2013). Governance and administrative education in South Eastern Europe: Genuine development, conditionality, and hesitations. Hrvatska i Komparativna Javna Uprava: Časopis Za Teoriju i Praksu Javne Uprave, 13(1), 5-39. https://hrcak.srce.hr/130636

Krajnák, S., Staronova, K. & Pickering, H. (2020). Ministerial advisers in Slovakia: Profiles and career paths, 2010-2020. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(2), 115-140. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0017

Kuhlmann, S., Wollmann, H. & Reiter, R. (2025). Introduction to comparative public administration: Administrative systems and reforms in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Lenin, V. I. & Chretien, T. (2015). State and Revolution: Fully Annotated Edition. Haymarket Books.

Maly, I. (2014). Decreasing willingness to study public administration programmes: An experience from Masaryk University. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 6(2), 147-154.

Maly, I., Mikusová Mericková, B., Murray Svidronová, M. & Jakus Muthová, N. (2025). Public Administration and Youth: Study of Value Orientation. Journal of Public Affairs Education, (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/15236803251392710

Marcetic, G., Novak, G. L. & Dzinic, J. (2013). Public Administration Education in Twelve Post-Socialist Countries and Croatia: Is There a Convergence? Croatian and Comparative Public Administration, 13(1), 123-160. https://hrcak.srce.hr/130640

Meyer-Sahling, J.-H. (2009). Varieties of legacies: a critical review of legacy explanations of public administration reform in East Central Europe. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 75(3), 509-528. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852309337670

Mikulowski, W. (2008). Between Tradition and Modernity the Past, Present and Future of Public Administration Degree Programmes in Poland. In G. Jenei & K. Mike (eds.), Public Administration and Public Policy Degree Programmes in Europe: The Road from Bologna (pp. 211-242). NISPAcee Press.

Misík, M., Oravcová, V., Plenta, P. & Hrabusajová, M. (2024). Keeping it regional: pseudo-internationalisation of Slovak political science. Higher Education, 88(2), 703-726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-023-01139-0

Nemec, J. (2006). EAPAA peer review accreditation and its potential to strengthen PA education: the case of CEE countries [14th NISPAcee Annual Conference]. NISPAcee.

Nemec, J., Spacek, D., Suwaj, P. & Modrzejewski, A. (2012). Public management as a university discipline in New European union member states: The Central European case. Public Management Review, 14(8), 1087-1108. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.657834

OECD (2017). National Schools of Government: Building Civil Service Capacity [OECD Public Governance Reviews]. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264268906-en

Olsson, J. (2020). Institutionalism and public administration. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics. Oxford University Press.

Painter, M. & Peters, B. G. (2010). Administrative traditions in comparative perspective: Families, groups and hybrids. In M. Painter & B. G. Peters (eds.), Tradition and public administration (pp. 19-30). Palgrave Macmillan.

Pal, L. A. & Clark, I. D. (2016). Teaching public policy: Global convergence or difference? Policy and Society, 35(4), 283-297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.11.006

Peters, B. G. (2019). Institutional theory in political science: The new institutionalism. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Peters, B. G. (2021). Administrative traditions: Understanding the roots of contemporary administrative behavior. Oxford University Press.

Pevcin, P., Spacek, D. & Klimovsky, D. (2019). Public administration education in the CEE countries: How has it developed during the recent decades? The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 12(2), 217-232. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2019-0020

Placek, M., Nemec, J., Spacek, D. & Pisár, P. (2025). Public Administration Education in the Czech Republic: Facing Marginalization. Public Administration Review, 85(6), 1901-1915. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.70061

Randma-Liiv, T. & Connaughton, B. (2005). Public administration as a field of study: Divergence or convergence in the light of “Europeanization”? TRAMES: A Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences, 9(4), 348-360. https://doi.org/10.3176/tr.2005.4.03

Reichard, C. & Schröter, E. (2018). Education and Training in Public Administration and Management in Europe. In E. Ongaro & S. van Thiel (eds.), The Palgrave Handbook of Public Administration and Management in Europe (pp. 41-60). Palgrave Macmillan.

Rybár, M. & Podmaník, M. (2020). The politics of appointment of top civil servants: Career backgrounds and civil service politicization in the Czech Republic. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(2), 75-92. https://doi.org/10.2478/nispa-2020-0015

Salazar Morales, D., Jhagroe, S. & Pineda, P. (2025). (De)colonial public administration education? A comparative study of North-South curricular differences. Teaching Public Administration, (online first). https://doi.org/10.1177/01447394251364253

Sarapuu, K. & Saarniit, L. (2020). Public administration in Estonia: A search for identity. In G. Bouckaert & J. Werner (eds.), European Perspectives on Public Administration. The Way Forward (pp. 317-333). Leuven University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvv417th.20

Schöpflin, G. (2018). The political traditions of Eastern Europe. In S. R. Graubard (ed.), Eastern Europe... Central Europe... Europe (pp. 59-94). Routledge.

Stare, J. & Vintar, M. (2008). The Development and Role of Specialised Education in Public Administration for Public Sector Transformation: The Case of Slovenia. In G. Jenei & K. Mike (eds.), Public Administration and Public Policy Degree Programmes in Europe: The Road from Bologna (pp. 265-284). NISPAcee Press.

Staronová, K. & Gajduschek, G. (2016). Public administration education in CEE countries: Institutionalization of a discipline. Policy and Society, 35(4), 351-370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2016.11.002

Staronová, K., Rybár, M. & Spác, P. (2025). Anticipating illiberalism: drivers of bureaucratic turnover intention. Public Money & Management, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2025.2597951

Verheijen, T. & Connaughton, B. (2003). Public administration education and Europeanization: Prospects for the emancipation of a discipline? Public Administration, 81(4), 833-851. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2003.00373.x